Search for: All records

The excision of specific tRNA-derived small RNAs (tsRNAs), yRNA-derived small RNAs (ysRNAs) and ribosomal RNA-derived small RNAs (rsRNAs) is now well established. Several reports have suggested many of these fragments function much like traditional microRNAs (miRNAs). That said, whereas the expressions of the majority of appreciably expressed miRNAs in HCT116 colon cancer cells are significantly decreased in individual knockouts (KOs) of DROSHA, DGCR8, XPO5, and DICER, on average, only 3.5% of tsRNA, ysRNA, and rsRNA expressions are impaired. Conversely, tsRNA, ysRNA, and rsRNA expressions are significantly increased in each of these KOs as compared to WT. As such, although DICER has been suggested to be involved with the expression of specific tsRNAs, ysRNAs, and rsRNAs, our study finds no evidence supporting the involvement of any of these canonical miRNA biogenesis enzymes in their expressions. 

Abstract Several studies have now described instances where G-rich sequences in promoters and enhancers regulate gene expression through forming G-quadruplex (G4) structures. Relatedly, our group recently identified 301 long genomic stretches significantly enriched for minimal G4 motifs (LG4s) in humans and found the majority of these overlap annotated enhancers, and furthermore, that the promoters regulated by these LG4 enhancers are similarly enriched with G4-capable sequences. While the generally accepted model for enhancer:promoter specificity maintains that interactions are dictated by enhancer- and promoter-bound transcriptional activator proteins, the current study tested an alternative hypothesis: that LG4 enhancers interact with cognate promoters via a direct G4:G4 DNA-based mechanism. This work establishes the nuclear proximity of LG4 enhancer:promoter pairs, biochemically demonstrates the ability of individual LG4 single-stranded DNAs (ssDNAs) to directly interact target promoter ssDNAs, and confirms that these interactions, as well as the ability of LG4 enhancers to activate target promoters in culture, are mediated by G4 DNA. 

SARS-CoV-2 (SC2) has been intensely studied since its emergence. However, the mechanisms of host immune dysregulation triggered by SC2 remain poorly understood. That said, it is well established that many prominent viral families encode microRNAs (miRNAs) or related small viral RNAs (svRNAs) capable of regulating human genes involved in immune function. Importantly, recent reports have shown that SC2 encodes its own svRNAs. In this study, we have identified 12 svRNAs expressed during SC2 infection and show that one of these svRNAs can regulate target gene expression via complementary binding to mRNA 3’ untranslated regions (3’UTRs) much like human microRNAs. 

SnoRNAs are frequently processed into snoRNA-derived RNAs (sdRNAs) that function much like traditional microRNAs (miRNAs). That said, our analyses suggest a global switch from DICER-dependent (predominately miRNA) to DICER-independent (predominately sdRNA) biogenesis/gene regulation in colon cancer. Whereas the expressions of 259 of 288 appreciably expressed miRNAs are significantly decreased (avg. 6.4% of WT) in human colon cancer DICER-KOs, 95 of 103 sdRNAs are conversely, significantly increased (avg. 679.3%) in DICER-KOs as compared to WT. As many diseases are characterized by DICER deficiency, this putative global switch to DICER-independent sdRNA regulations may contribute to an array of human diseases. 

We have identified 38 specifically excised, differentially expressed snoRNA fragments (sdRNAs) in TCGA prostate cancer (PCa) patient samples as compared to normal prostate controls. SnoRNA-derived fragments sdRNA-D19b and -A24 emerged among the most differentially expressed and were selected for further experimentation. We found that the overexpression of either sdRNA significantly increased PC3 (a well-established model of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)) cell proliferation, and that sdRNA-D19b overexpression also markedly increased the rate of PC3 cell migration. In addition, both sdRNAs provided drug-specific resistances with sdRNA-D19b levels correlating with paclitaxel resistance and sdRNA-24A conferring dasatinib resistance. In silico and in vitro analyses revealed that two established PCa tumor suppressor genes, CD44 and CDK12, represent targets for sdRNA-D19b and sdRNA-A24, respectively. This outlines a biologically coherent mechanism by which sdRNAs downregulate tumor suppressors in AR-PCa to enhance proliferative and metastatic capabilities and to encourage chemotherapeutic resistance. Aggressive proliferation, rampant metastasis, and recalcitrance to chemotherapy are core characteristics of CRPC that synergize to produce a pathology that ranks second in cancer-related deaths for men. This study defines sdRNA-D19b and -A24 as contributors to AR-PCa, potentially providing novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets of use in PCa clinical intervention.